The following are all messages sent on Facebook (as only the most important messages are):
DM (Warwick professor) to Gwen Kent
Please can you send your snail-mail address as soon as possible for sending a contributor's copy of the anthology Dove Release: New Flights and Voices (Worple Press) in which your work appears.
The anthology is due out early next year but the publisher needs the addresses of all contributors very soon,
Many Thanks
D.
Gwen Kent to DM
Hi D,
Are you sure you sent this message to the right person? I don't remember contributing my work to any new anthologies, or being alerted to anyone else doing so ... but in the small hope you do have the right person:
[address]
Gwen Kent to NL (fellow course alumni)
I just got this message from DM out of the blue:
"[DM's message]"
Er. What? Did they send this to you too? I'm pretty sure I don't remember contributing any of my shitty work to any publishers ... Rupert thinks DM's been flogging our work because Warwick owns the rights to anything we wrote during our time as students (lol) but I just think he sent the message to the wrong person. What is going on N?!?! and how are things? xx
NL to Gwen Kent
Hey Darling
Of course I didnt get that email - dont think DM even knows I exist, sob. I didn't take their poetry class either ... deffo they are so porning all our work off as their own, [another tutor]'s new book is probably just a selected works from our class of geniuses. I often thought that about creative writing, we were just giving our already established tutors more ideas etc they could publish. Anyhows - congrats though, getting anything published is wicked. Hope you get some money or something. Or at the very least you can reference it on your CV as a published writer - booyeah! Title sounds a bit like a self-help book. But I'll def get it from amazon if I know proceeds are supporting fellow creative writers. Well maybe not if [posh fellow alumni] is published in it ha ha!
Gwen Kent to CJ (fellow course alumni)
Er. I just got this message from DM ... did he send it to you too? What is going on? I can only think he sent it to the wrong person! (and how are you btw?)
"[DM's message]"
CJ to Gwen Kent
I think that might be meant for me? Obviously he has us confused. Its because we both have curly hair and freckles - or not!! I'll email him.
... sad moment for Gwen Kent, as she believes CJ is probably right ... CJ got a first on her creative dissertation on poetry after all, and DM had said at the time that she could be a great new voice for the next generation of poets. Then, a few days later ...
DM to Gwen Kent
Dear Gwen
You may recall my mentioning in class that the workshops and poets were part of a project that may lead to an anthology? Your poem chosen is below:
[do I even have the right to publish my poem on this blog any more? Or does Worple Press own my soul?]
Gwen Kent to DM
!!
This makes me very happy indeed! I was sure you had the wrong person. Thank you for choosing one of my poems!! I'm ecstatic!
DM to Gwen Kent
It's a very handsome anthology and your work sits well in it.
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
OK OK OK - I'M PUBLISHED!
Sorted into:
my life at Warwick,
random and possibly humorous,
to do with Literature
Sunday, November 08, 2009
Elly Jackson

Just a quick word to say: this woman is amazing.

Loads of people I know, both men a women, cringe at the mention of her, and others are in love with her, like me. For example, browse over the comments on the youtube video of Bulletproof:
she looks like more masculin that feminin.
shees...sooo.....HOT FUCKomg<3
ugly
what a werido.
uh, excuse me? did I miss something? how is she not gorgeous?
I'd lick her from head to toe.
she's not ugly... she's cool.
soooooo ugly
ugly so ugly...
her face really like a man..but cool
I LOVE her style!
she looks like more masculin that feminin.
shees...sooo.....HOT FUCKomg<3
ugly
what a werido.
uh, excuse me? did I miss something? how is she not gorgeous?
I'd lick her from head to toe.
she's not ugly... she's cool.
soooooo ugly
ugly so ugly...
her face really like a man..but cool
I LOVE her style!
It's like Marmite, except that unlike liking a flavour, I know clearly why I like her. It's because I do honestly find the look attractive. I'm so sick of seeing stereotypical faces of fashionably monofaced women who get their tits out and dance around like strippers become instant hits because of it.

It's as though the world of popular music thinks human beings only have one vision of what makes an attractive woman - or, to be more exacting, what men envisage to be an attractive woman. That is, one who they can plug into their wank banks. To be fair to men, I have heard a few praise her appearance, so it only goes to prove that the world of popular music may be wrong. People do not, after all, have one track minds, and can find unusual and refreshing faces intriguing and attractive, and will buy their music off the shelves just as they would from any other band.
Thank you Elly Jackson for existing, and thanks to all those who helped her become well known.
Sorted into:
random and possibly humorous,
Rather Thoughtful
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Ho Yes. More Work Experience For Gwenfron.
After waiting a month for a response on my CV from a news program on Al Jazeera, after several promised phone calls that never happened, I have got a thumbs up and a provisional date in my inbox for mid-October.
ARGH!
I am so ecstatic and so very uncool in my ecstaticness: I plan to buy a huge candle I've been eyeing up in the local shop as a pat on the back to myself, and quite possibly some chocolate. But I've got to be careful there. Unemployment has made me a little too well padded for the coming winter. Maybe I'll buy some celery instead - doesn't celery use more calories to digest than the human system can extract from it? No wonder. Disgusting stuff. Chocolate it is.
I wonder whether this Work Experience will be enjoyable? It's going to be for a whole month, so I hope they won't dump too much hard work on me. I'll be a runner, and though I've explained to several people what I deem the role to be, I actually have no idea what a day in the life of Gwen The Runner might look like.
Well, I suppose we'll be seeing soon enough.
ARGH!
ARGH!
I am so ecstatic and so very uncool in my ecstaticness: I plan to buy a huge candle I've been eyeing up in the local shop as a pat on the back to myself, and quite possibly some chocolate. But I've got to be careful there. Unemployment has made me a little too well padded for the coming winter. Maybe I'll buy some celery instead - doesn't celery use more calories to digest than the human system can extract from it? No wonder. Disgusting stuff. Chocolate it is.
I wonder whether this Work Experience will be enjoyable? It's going to be for a whole month, so I hope they won't dump too much hard work on me. I'll be a runner, and though I've explained to several people what I deem the role to be, I actually have no idea what a day in the life of Gwen The Runner might look like.
Well, I suppose we'll be seeing soon enough.
ARGH!
Sorted into:
my life Unemployed
Friday, September 25, 2009
On Being Unemployed
Well, it gets at you. Not because it's bad, chilling out, reading every single Harry Potter and playing your brother's copy of Zelda: The Windwaker, but because you know everybody thinks you're lazy and generally an unhelpful member of society. Not being on J. S. A. helps me maintain reasonably low levels of anxiety, but doesn't help me in that I don't have the fear of being placed in any old job hanging over me to urge me onwards into the world of work.
Since graduating I've done two weeks of work experience with William Hartston, and gone on a ten day holiday to France staying with my boyfriend and some of his friends in their rented villa. Wow. That was one crazy holiday. 60,000 euros for a bottle of Champagne, anyone? No? Then the cheapest thing on the table menu is a 300 and something bottle of vodka. Oh my. What excitement.
But that was an age ago. Since then, I've been on my own, starved of internet, starved of company (apart from a single friend living a street away, who has now moved back to her uni life at Aberystwyth), starved of TV channels ... when I tell the few people I do see of my lifestyle they are appalled. 'But what do you DO all day?' Meh. Read. Play Zelda. Watch Star Trek: TNG. Have long baths. Go on jogs. Worry about the size of my bum and eat chocolate. People are even more appalled at this reply. What a waste of time, all the things you do - it's as though you're only doing them to fill up the emptiness! Well, yes, but then everything we do is generally to fill up the emptiness of life. Jobs are a great way to get rid of time, get some meaning in life. I wouldn't mind having one, but I'm terrified, not of the concept of losing all of my free time, but at the concept of having to commit to something that I may not enjoy. That Saturday job at Clarks all those years ago really fucked me up. And I know I'm liable to depression, random crying jags and sweats of anxiety and paranoia. It's a horrible thought that whatever job I go for might destroy me.
And all this worrying seeps into other elements of my life. One day, when my boyfriend drove all the way down to see me, we decided that it was for the best that we break things off. Well. Oh dear. Needless to say it didn't last too long. Soon the break up lost the 'up' bit, and now, a few days later, the whole thing is healing itself like an accidental scratch.
I'm in the local Nailsworth library as I write this, crossing my fingers that the damn computer won't crash (ctrl-alt-delete doesn't have any effect so you just have to gaze pleadingly at the screen until it sorts itself out) and might, if I can face it, meander through potential jobs, have a panic attack, run from the library crying and return home to try and drown myself in the bath.
Wish me luck. For job searching or drowing. Not sure which is worse.
Since graduating I've done two weeks of work experience with William Hartston, and gone on a ten day holiday to France staying with my boyfriend and some of his friends in their rented villa. Wow. That was one crazy holiday. 60,000 euros for a bottle of Champagne, anyone? No? Then the cheapest thing on the table menu is a 300 and something bottle of vodka. Oh my. What excitement.
But that was an age ago. Since then, I've been on my own, starved of internet, starved of company (apart from a single friend living a street away, who has now moved back to her uni life at Aberystwyth), starved of TV channels ... when I tell the few people I do see of my lifestyle they are appalled. 'But what do you DO all day?' Meh. Read. Play Zelda. Watch Star Trek: TNG. Have long baths. Go on jogs. Worry about the size of my bum and eat chocolate. People are even more appalled at this reply. What a waste of time, all the things you do - it's as though you're only doing them to fill up the emptiness! Well, yes, but then everything we do is generally to fill up the emptiness of life. Jobs are a great way to get rid of time, get some meaning in life. I wouldn't mind having one, but I'm terrified, not of the concept of losing all of my free time, but at the concept of having to commit to something that I may not enjoy. That Saturday job at Clarks all those years ago really fucked me up. And I know I'm liable to depression, random crying jags and sweats of anxiety and paranoia. It's a horrible thought that whatever job I go for might destroy me.
And all this worrying seeps into other elements of my life. One day, when my boyfriend drove all the way down to see me, we decided that it was for the best that we break things off. Well. Oh dear. Needless to say it didn't last too long. Soon the break up lost the 'up' bit, and now, a few days later, the whole thing is healing itself like an accidental scratch.
I'm in the local Nailsworth library as I write this, crossing my fingers that the damn computer won't crash (ctrl-alt-delete doesn't have any effect so you just have to gaze pleadingly at the screen until it sorts itself out) and might, if I can face it, meander through potential jobs, have a panic attack, run from the library crying and return home to try and drown myself in the bath.
Wish me luck. For job searching or drowing. Not sure which is worse.
Sorted into:
my life Unemployed
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Graduation: The End of Warwick and Beyond
So. I got a 2:1. Just scraped at a 1st with my fingernails but it didn't stick. I was upset. Of course I was upset. But that's life. Not everyone can get one, and it's not like I'd been expecting one, or even imagining I could get one, for the majority of my student life.
So. I graduated. Got to wear the robes, say an official goodbye to Warwick. Shake hands. Show my gratitude to the two tutors who bothered to show up at the reception. Thank you George Ttoouli and John Rignall for being there.
So. I'm in London now. Right now. I'm sitting in a room in London. Right now. ARGH! True excitement. What a city, eh? I managed to secure a two week work experience with the Daily Express, with William Hartston, who does several features, including the Beachcomber column, the Alphabeaters and the Sudoku. I look up facts, respond to letters he gets. It is A. M. A. Z. I. N. G.
Wow. Firstly, he's a nice guy. Secondly, the Express's home is a funky glass building with amazing lifts. Thirdly, it's plonked down right by London Bridge and the Gherkin. Fourthly, I'm staying with friends near Hampstead Heath. Fifthly, I've been invited to apply to two other work experience positions. Sixthly, I'm not in Stroud. Simply fantastic. And, to top it all off, I'm going to Nice on the 6th of August!
It's enough to make me forget I'm actually unemployed in the middle of a recession! HURRAH for LIFE!
So. I graduated. Got to wear the robes, say an official goodbye to Warwick. Shake hands. Show my gratitude to the two tutors who bothered to show up at the reception. Thank you George Ttoouli and John Rignall for being there.
So. I'm in London now. Right now. I'm sitting in a room in London. Right now. ARGH! True excitement. What a city, eh? I managed to secure a two week work experience with the Daily Express, with William Hartston, who does several features, including the Beachcomber column, the Alphabeaters and the Sudoku. I look up facts, respond to letters he gets. It is A. M. A. Z. I. N. G.
Wow. Firstly, he's a nice guy. Secondly, the Express's home is a funky glass building with amazing lifts. Thirdly, it's plonked down right by London Bridge and the Gherkin. Fourthly, I'm staying with friends near Hampstead Heath. Fifthly, I've been invited to apply to two other work experience positions. Sixthly, I'm not in Stroud. Simply fantastic. And, to top it all off, I'm going to Nice on the 6th of August!
It's enough to make me forget I'm actually unemployed in the middle of a recession! HURRAH for LIFE!
Sorted into:
my life at Warwick
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Time For A Star Trek Post
Having just stumbled across Justin's post on the same topic, and since I couldn't leave a comment, I needed a different place to channel my Trek filled thoughts into. So. As per usual, bloggypoos bears the brunt. Here it is.
One of the many funky posters - though I can proudly say I saw it on the 7th,
not the 8th ... must've come out sooner here than in the States ... wahey!
Firstly, I'm a fan of TNG, not TOS, so I went to the film only knowing the basics - the Kobayashi Maru, that Pike was the original Captain, that Scotty says 'I'm giving her all she's got!' and Bones is generally grumpy and stressed, etc - but I was still impressed. I was a fan who was looking for faithfulness to Gene Roddenberry's utopian vision (as mocked here), and so, like most other fans, was nervous on going in, almost expecting to be disappointed, especially after having seen J. J. Abrams in interviews saying things like 'I don't really like Star Trek ... I wanted to liven it up so it appeals to everyone, not just the weirdoes.' Humph.
But he did a great job. Shall I make a list? I think I will:
1. The cast was excellent, especially Spock and McCoy. It was fantastic that the central roles were played by actors I'm otherwise unfamiliar with - though unfortunately I was distracted by visions of Shawn of the Dead, Little Women, and House when I saw Simon Pegg, Winona Ryder and Jennifer Morrison.
2. The cinematography: the movement of the camera was effective, there was a great balance of wide shots for action and very intimate close ups. There was a lot of diagonal tilting and lens reflection which not only gave it unique style but a sense of appealing brightness which you don't really get in many of the older films...
3. ...which leads me on to design: I loved the reinvention of the old equipment and the transporter effects - quite beautiful, and takes nothing away from the older versions, only adds to them and reinforces the genius behind them. And that Romulan 'mining' vessel - well, blimey. It was awesome.
4. The plot. I really loved it - reminded me of many TNG episodes where there were problems which turned out to be revolved around time frames, parallel universes, etc. They were some of my favourite episodes - like the very final one, for example, when Picard is - sorry. I'll stop myself there. Anyway this plot was awesome on many levels: it ingeniously allows writers to take the old characters and play with them in original ways for future films, it allows for villains who are driven by real sorrow who are not just cardboard cut outs, and it puts the 'new' Star Trek into it's own, unique category, not just a 'remake'.
Now, to things I wasn't so keen on:
1. Aliens. Why do they keep adding more? There are so many aliens in the Star Trek world already, billions from all of the episodes which come and go, and I sort of wish they'd use them rather than just keeping on inventing new ones. Also I have to say I sighed a bit when Kirk was being chased by the massive monstor on the ice planet. It was a bit comic book cartoony, not at all like an animal - just a monstor to be scary, not a thinking predator. Even the scary and dangerous creatures in most Star Trek plots end up being exposed as creatures fighting for life ... like the crystalline entity. Ooh I'd love to see that in a modern film ...
2. Women. I know in the original Star Trek Uhuru was the only woman, but it kind of got on my nerves that this was being called 'a boys film'. In fact, I wasn't even thinking about that at all when I was watching - it was only when I got home and watched interviews with the actors that they were all saying 'oh it's a guys film, Uhuru's there to keep the boys in check' blabla SHUT UP! Star Trek is definitely a unisex thing, OK? Stop stereotyping and let's just remember what Star Trek's about, not what the people who shy away from it think it's about. Anyway, I could've done with a more TNG ratio for the female characters, rather than just have the mothers and the spicy love interests. Though I have to say I think TOS was better at getting the different nationalities in there than TNG was. I love Chekhov especially.
3. The Kobayashi Maru. I love the story, especially when Kirk (played by Shatner) reminisces about it in one of the older films, but was a little disappointed. I thought it was way too obvious he was cheating. He's completely incompetent in his instructions up until the point where the system shuts down, and when it starts up again he instantly manages to destroy the virtual enemy without so much as a second thought - how is it that Spock is the only one that suspects foul play? It's just a little too nonchalant to be realistic. The people of The Academy are, you will remember, some of the cleverest people in the Star Trek world. Kirk's cheat (as I imagine it anyway) was a great thing not only because it was brash and daring, but because it was ingeniously played out, which here I just don't think it was.
4. Er. Nope can't think of anything else. Though Justin's point about ranking was very valid. Go read his post.
So yes. Go see it if you haven't. It's a great thing. May Star Trek continue to be cherished by every new generation, I say ...
One of the many funky posters - though I can proudly say I saw it on the 7th,not the 8th ... must've come out sooner here than in the States ... wahey!
Firstly, I'm a fan of TNG, not TOS, so I went to the film only knowing the basics - the Kobayashi Maru, that Pike was the original Captain, that Scotty says 'I'm giving her all she's got!' and Bones is generally grumpy and stressed, etc - but I was still impressed. I was a fan who was looking for faithfulness to Gene Roddenberry's utopian vision (as mocked here), and so, like most other fans, was nervous on going in, almost expecting to be disappointed, especially after having seen J. J. Abrams in interviews saying things like 'I don't really like Star Trek ... I wanted to liven it up so it appeals to everyone, not just the weirdoes.' Humph.
But he did a great job. Shall I make a list? I think I will:
1. The cast was excellent, especially Spock and McCoy. It was fantastic that the central roles were played by actors I'm otherwise unfamiliar with - though unfortunately I was distracted by visions of Shawn of the Dead, Little Women, and House when I saw Simon Pegg, Winona Ryder and Jennifer Morrison.
2. The cinematography: the movement of the camera was effective, there was a great balance of wide shots for action and very intimate close ups. There was a lot of diagonal tilting and lens reflection which not only gave it unique style but a sense of appealing brightness which you don't really get in many of the older films...
3. ...which leads me on to design: I loved the reinvention of the old equipment and the transporter effects - quite beautiful, and takes nothing away from the older versions, only adds to them and reinforces the genius behind them. And that Romulan 'mining' vessel - well, blimey. It was awesome.
4. The plot. I really loved it - reminded me of many TNG episodes where there were problems which turned out to be revolved around time frames, parallel universes, etc. They were some of my favourite episodes - like the very final one, for example, when Picard is - sorry. I'll stop myself there. Anyway this plot was awesome on many levels: it ingeniously allows writers to take the old characters and play with them in original ways for future films, it allows for villains who are driven by real sorrow who are not just cardboard cut outs, and it puts the 'new' Star Trek into it's own, unique category, not just a 'remake'.
Now, to things I wasn't so keen on:
1. Aliens. Why do they keep adding more? There are so many aliens in the Star Trek world already, billions from all of the episodes which come and go, and I sort of wish they'd use them rather than just keeping on inventing new ones. Also I have to say I sighed a bit when Kirk was being chased by the massive monstor on the ice planet. It was a bit comic book cartoony, not at all like an animal - just a monstor to be scary, not a thinking predator. Even the scary and dangerous creatures in most Star Trek plots end up being exposed as creatures fighting for life ... like the crystalline entity. Ooh I'd love to see that in a modern film ...
2. Women. I know in the original Star Trek Uhuru was the only woman, but it kind of got on my nerves that this was being called 'a boys film'. In fact, I wasn't even thinking about that at all when I was watching - it was only when I got home and watched interviews with the actors that they were all saying 'oh it's a guys film, Uhuru's there to keep the boys in check' blabla SHUT UP! Star Trek is definitely a unisex thing, OK? Stop stereotyping and let's just remember what Star Trek's about, not what the people who shy away from it think it's about. Anyway, I could've done with a more TNG ratio for the female characters, rather than just have the mothers and the spicy love interests. Though I have to say I think TOS was better at getting the different nationalities in there than TNG was. I love Chekhov especially.
3. The Kobayashi Maru. I love the story, especially when Kirk (played by Shatner) reminisces about it in one of the older films, but was a little disappointed. I thought it was way too obvious he was cheating. He's completely incompetent in his instructions up until the point where the system shuts down, and when it starts up again he instantly manages to destroy the virtual enemy without so much as a second thought - how is it that Spock is the only one that suspects foul play? It's just a little too nonchalant to be realistic. The people of The Academy are, you will remember, some of the cleverest people in the Star Trek world. Kirk's cheat (as I imagine it anyway) was a great thing not only because it was brash and daring, but because it was ingeniously played out, which here I just don't think it was.
4. Er. Nope can't think of anything else. Though Justin's point about ranking was very valid. Go read his post.
So yes. Go see it if you haven't. It's a great thing. May Star Trek continue to be cherished by every new generation, I say ...
Sorted into:
to do with Film
Monday, May 25, 2009
Rediscovering Music And Not Much To Do
I just finished a mind map of all my skills, while listening to music I had virtually forgotten about.
At the moment I'm staying in my room - yes, my own room! - so that Rupert can have peace and solitude to revise in. I myself have now finished, Eighteenth Century and all. They went ... OK? Truth is I have no way to tell. No disasters, but no real ebullience either (except for perhaps enjoying half of my Shakespeare exam, but that may've been fuelled by going in with the knowledge of that 76 I got on my coursework ... I just can't get over it). If you're curious, here are the Eighteenth Century questions I answered. They were a bit more straight forward than the questions of the other exams, requiring more regurgitation than thought, I felt:
Section A
2. Why is the travel narrative such an appealing vehicle in Gulliver's Travels?
Section B
6. What are the dangers associated with the sentimental identified by the young Jane Austen?
Section C
7. Write an essay on the self-consciously Enlightened traveller/explorer in the eighteenth-century. (I drew on Lady Wortley Montagu, Cook, Sterne and Crusoe ... perhaps to many ...)
Anyway, now, by myself, sleeping in my own bed, surrounded by my own things - wonderful. I feel ... weirdly free. I also have plenty of my down moments, as usual, but that seems to be how I am in general. The music is a really great thing, though. I feel like I'm finding myself again. And the mind map I just did - god, I'm skilled! Haha, well, it looks like I am on paper anyway. Truth is, even though I've done a bunch of things which should prove I have confidence (theatre, etc) I actually have very little, which is a bummer as it's one of the key things employers look for. I've got to find a way of staying bubbly and not falling into my ubiquitously hovering pit of despair. Which is an impossible thing to escape, by the way.
Even when I got my dissertation and fiction work back I was not as gleeful as I should have been - bad day - though now I can really relish it. I'm even thinking about submitting some short stories to magazines ... bloody hell, that's scary, eh? Well we'll see, I just emailed my tutor to gather advice on how to go about it.
So - what were my results on those things? Get on with it, I hear you cry! Well, I got 70 on the dissertation and 72 on the fiction ... argh!!!
So, actually, this is what my marks look like so far (including the four modules of last year):
EN227 Romantic and Victorian Poetry (62%)
15% Coursework 1 : Close Reading of On the Grasshopper and the Cricket by Keats, 1,500 words, 59
35% Coursework 2 : Discuss the exploration of sexual desire in Romantic and/or Victorian Poetry, looking at Anactoria by Swinburne, Porphyria's Lover and My Last Duchess by Browning, Goblin Market by Rossetti, The Beginning of the End and The Windhover by Hopkins, 3,500 words, 62
50% Exam : 63
EN232 Composition and Creative Writing (70%)
50% Coursework 1 : Portfolio of Narrative and Anti-Narrative Fiction, 1,500 word commentary and 4,000 word collection, 70
50% Coursework 2 : Research Project and short book analyses of Stuart, A Life Backwards and What is the What?, 1,000 word analysis and 4,000 word project, 70
EN238 The Practice of Poetry (68%)
50% Coursework : Portfolio of Poetry (with introduction), 4,000 words, 69
50% Exam : 67
EN245 The Nineteenth Century English Novel (67%)
50% Coursework : ‘The acutest men are often under an illusion about women … their good woman is a queer thing, half doll, half angel; their bad woman almost always a fiend’. (Shirley). Examine the ways in which any two novels endorse, adapt, or challenge these stereotypes, looking at Tess of the d'Urbervilles and North and South, 5,000 words, 64
50% Exam : 69
EN301 Shakespeare and Selected Dramatists of his Time
50% Coursework : Creative Project : Cressida Complete, 1,700 word commentary and 3,000 project, 76
50% Exam : ?
EN329 Personal Writing Project (70%)
100% Coursework : Fiction : ‘Mary’, 2,000 word commentary and 10,000 word project, 70
EN330 Eighteenth-Century Literature
50% Coursework : Why do you think Richardson’s Pamela proved so vulnerable to misreading and parody in its time? Also examined the satires Shamela and Anti-Pamela, 5,000 words, 68
50% Exam : ?
EN236 Practise of Fiction : Contexts, Themes and Techniques
50% Coursework : Portfolio of Fiction, 4,000 words, 72
50% Exam : ?
Rupert and I have two bets going: £5 on whether I get a first (he's got the affirmative) and £1 on whether I get one or more Firsts for any of my exams (again, he's got the more optimistic side, though I know this is very unlikely - I've never gotten a First for an exam before). My logic in this bet is that if I do get a 2:1 then at least I have a little money coming in as consolation! If I do actually get a First (very unlikely, by the way) then I won't care about losing 5 or 6 quid.
The lowest First possible (that would be the one I'm aiming for, lol, and is so on the borderline it's not guaranteed they award it - god, I might have to go for a viva - sob) consists of 3 out of the student's 7 highest modules to each have scored a First, with a minimum average of 68. Well my average at the moment including my weakest module (Romantic and Victorian) is 68, and without it just rounds up to 70, so I'm definitely on the edge here. I've got 2 Firsts on modules over all, so I just need one more and to maintain the average and I've got it. But, again, no guarantee - it all depends on how those bloody exams went (don't call them bloody Gwen, you'll jinx it! I like you really, exams, you're the best things ever ... )
Don't know what's come over me. I've always loved getting high marks and good feedback, but I've never really expected it - or even aspired to it! I never imagined I'd even have the potential of getting a First back when I was a young carefree Fresher. Those were the days.
Well. We'll see how things go, eh?
At the moment I'm staying in my room - yes, my own room! - so that Rupert can have peace and solitude to revise in. I myself have now finished, Eighteenth Century and all. They went ... OK? Truth is I have no way to tell. No disasters, but no real ebullience either (except for perhaps enjoying half of my Shakespeare exam, but that may've been fuelled by going in with the knowledge of that 76 I got on my coursework ... I just can't get over it). If you're curious, here are the Eighteenth Century questions I answered. They were a bit more straight forward than the questions of the other exams, requiring more regurgitation than thought, I felt:
Section A
2. Why is the travel narrative such an appealing vehicle in Gulliver's Travels?
Section B
6. What are the dangers associated with the sentimental identified by the young Jane Austen?
Section C
7. Write an essay on the self-consciously Enlightened traveller/explorer in the eighteenth-century. (I drew on Lady Wortley Montagu, Cook, Sterne and Crusoe ... perhaps to many ...)
Anyway, now, by myself, sleeping in my own bed, surrounded by my own things - wonderful. I feel ... weirdly free. I also have plenty of my down moments, as usual, but that seems to be how I am in general. The music is a really great thing, though. I feel like I'm finding myself again. And the mind map I just did - god, I'm skilled! Haha, well, it looks like I am on paper anyway. Truth is, even though I've done a bunch of things which should prove I have confidence (theatre, etc) I actually have very little, which is a bummer as it's one of the key things employers look for. I've got to find a way of staying bubbly and not falling into my ubiquitously hovering pit of despair. Which is an impossible thing to escape, by the way.
Even when I got my dissertation and fiction work back I was not as gleeful as I should have been - bad day - though now I can really relish it. I'm even thinking about submitting some short stories to magazines ... bloody hell, that's scary, eh? Well we'll see, I just emailed my tutor to gather advice on how to go about it.
So - what were my results on those things? Get on with it, I hear you cry! Well, I got 70 on the dissertation and 72 on the fiction ... argh!!!
So, actually, this is what my marks look like so far (including the four modules of last year):
EN227 Romantic and Victorian Poetry (62%)
15% Coursework 1 : Close Reading of On the Grasshopper and the Cricket by Keats, 1,500 words, 59
35% Coursework 2 : Discuss the exploration of sexual desire in Romantic and/or Victorian Poetry, looking at Anactoria by Swinburne, Porphyria's Lover and My Last Duchess by Browning, Goblin Market by Rossetti, The Beginning of the End and The Windhover by Hopkins, 3,500 words, 62
50% Exam : 63
EN232 Composition and Creative Writing (70%)
50% Coursework 1 : Portfolio of Narrative and Anti-Narrative Fiction, 1,500 word commentary and 4,000 word collection, 70
50% Coursework 2 : Research Project and short book analyses of Stuart, A Life Backwards and What is the What?, 1,000 word analysis and 4,000 word project, 70
EN238 The Practice of Poetry (68%)
50% Coursework : Portfolio of Poetry (with introduction), 4,000 words, 69
50% Exam : 67
EN245 The Nineteenth Century English Novel (67%)
50% Coursework : ‘The acutest men are often under an illusion about women … their good woman is a queer thing, half doll, half angel; their bad woman almost always a fiend’. (Shirley). Examine the ways in which any two novels endorse, adapt, or challenge these stereotypes, looking at Tess of the d'Urbervilles and North and South, 5,000 words, 64
50% Exam : 69
EN301 Shakespeare and Selected Dramatists of his Time
50% Coursework : Creative Project : Cressida Complete, 1,700 word commentary and 3,000 project, 76
50% Exam : ?
EN329 Personal Writing Project (70%)
100% Coursework : Fiction : ‘Mary’, 2,000 word commentary and 10,000 word project, 70
EN330 Eighteenth-Century Literature
50% Coursework : Why do you think Richardson’s Pamela proved so vulnerable to misreading and parody in its time? Also examined the satires Shamela and Anti-Pamela, 5,000 words, 68
50% Exam : ?
EN236 Practise of Fiction : Contexts, Themes and Techniques
50% Coursework : Portfolio of Fiction, 4,000 words, 72
50% Exam : ?
Rupert and I have two bets going: £5 on whether I get a first (he's got the affirmative) and £1 on whether I get one or more Firsts for any of my exams (again, he's got the more optimistic side, though I know this is very unlikely - I've never gotten a First for an exam before). My logic in this bet is that if I do get a 2:1 then at least I have a little money coming in as consolation! If I do actually get a First (very unlikely, by the way) then I won't care about losing 5 or 6 quid.
The lowest First possible (that would be the one I'm aiming for, lol, and is so on the borderline it's not guaranteed they award it - god, I might have to go for a viva - sob) consists of 3 out of the student's 7 highest modules to each have scored a First, with a minimum average of 68. Well my average at the moment including my weakest module (Romantic and Victorian) is 68, and without it just rounds up to 70, so I'm definitely on the edge here. I've got 2 Firsts on modules over all, so I just need one more and to maintain the average and I've got it. But, again, no guarantee - it all depends on how those bloody exams went (don't call them bloody Gwen, you'll jinx it! I like you really, exams, you're the best things ever ... )
Don't know what's come over me. I've always loved getting high marks and good feedback, but I've never really expected it - or even aspired to it! I never imagined I'd even have the potential of getting a First back when I was a young carefree Fresher. Those were the days.
Well. We'll see how things go, eh?
Sorted into:
my life at Warwick
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

